The Climate Crisis

Climate Change: The Root of All Problems?

           Unpredictable and violent weather, inhospitable temperatures, and food and water scarcity are among just a few problems we will face in the twenty-first century due to climate change. Many people, including the majority of the scientific community, accept climate change and know that changes must be made to live. There is, however, a piece of the climate conversation that is often overlooked: social and political consequences.
           Yes, official dialogues such as the United Nations Climate Change Conference encourage political action and consider social dynamics, but this is not enough. Food scarcity, caused by extreme weather events such as flooding or droughts, will affect the lower classes first. Those who already have limited access to food will only find that access becoming more limited. Similarly, these groups are often less mobile and could find their physical property damaged or uninhabitable by flooding, storms, or pollution. What are we to do when these people have nowhere to live and nothing to eat?
           We can already see the effects in some countries- violence and hunger are both widespread in Eastern Africa, particularly the Horn of Africa, where rainfall has become less predictable and generally decreased. Historically, social, economic, religious, and ethnic groups have had conflicts, but climate change will only exacerbate these conflicts. What does this mean for the U.S.? We hear about conflicts and violence in the U.S. in the news every day. I imagine that it could only get worse when New York City is underwater.
           In contrast, consider the major enemy of climate activists: oil. The Middle East and parts of Latin America (e.g. Venezuela, Brazil) are rich with oil. What will these countries do if a major part of their economy is no longer used because of climate action? Venezuela and parts of the Middle East are already unstable. Will climate change exacerbate their conflicts, or will climate action?
           We do not have answers to most of these questions, but these are issues (social, ethnic, or religious conflict, food scarcity, natural disasters, poverty, etc.) already being studied outside the field of climate change. We should consider each of these problems through the lens of climate change and what that means for our future. It's possible that some solutions to our climate problem may indirectly alleviate other world problems.

Comments

  1. Hey Emilie, your post includes many examples of problems caused/exacerbated by climate change that affect certain countries specifically—decreasing waterfall in the Horn of Africa, the possibility of NY sinking in the US, etc—and a criticism of a supranational attempt to address climate change—the United Nations Climate Change Conference—so do you believe that the problems caused/exacerbated by climate change are better solved on a national level with each country working on its own problems? If so, what should be done to address countries with heads of state like Donald Trump who supports the oil industry?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Emilie, I agree that climate change is one of, if not the most concerning issue in today's world of politics and your reasoning was entirely valid. By broadening the issue of climate change in discussing the effects of warming and nearly limited resources you were able to highlight the economic and political obstacles that are preventing effective change. Politicians with ties to oil companies or those who just simply refuse to believe in this world-altering event stand in the way of millions who will not have access to simple survival necessities in the next couple of years. One of the main arguments for this reluctance to take action is that they will not live long enough to see it to fruition. Having lived a long life already, many heads of state and CEOs aren't looking to protect future generations from food scarcity, flooding, and toxic air exposure. Adding to this unwillingness to act, the recent United States departure from the Paris Agreement (due to certain conditions of not being able to continue building coal-fired power plants despite co-signers' ability to), many have lost hope of any reconciliation and eventual plan of action between the US and those within the Paris Agreement such as China and India. While official dialogues have encouraged political action, those in charge have refuted studies on the detrimental effects of climate change and the urgent need to keep global temperature changes below a two-degree (C) increase of pre-industrial statistics. With the financial support of those who profit from climate change, many politicians often refute plans of action or slow down the entire process, effectively securing their future while sentencing younger generations to a life of hardships.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment